Ethics as Electives: How import is ethics in relation to strategic communication

by Rashida Douglas

Why is business ethics distinguished from ethics in general? Is it because there is a separate code of conduct that is acceptable in business that is not acceptable in interpersonal relationships? The “Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public Relations: Pure and Applied” discusses the lack of emphasis placed on ethics in strategic communications academics and how this lack of proper ethics engagement results in public relations catastrophes like that of Enron and Arthur Anderson. Albert S. Atkinson, a contributing writer to the book, goes on to say that there was not enough culpability placed on the corporate communicators who acted as the “faces” of these organizations. “I found that out of 13 universities offering advanced accounting degrees only one required an ethics course, while of the 12 universities offering advanced communication degrees, none made ethics a required course.”

According to the book the public also has a keen sense of where the ethical barometer lies according to profession. Polls indicate 90 percent of individuals surveyed believe fire fighters have a high ethical standard, 58 percent for college teachers, 25 percent for executives and 11 percent for advertising professionals--the category most closely related to public relations. How can PR practitioners create the soul of an organization if they have no ethical framework for guiding their decision-making? Essentially, the text indicates there should be more emphasis placed on how ethics fits into strategic communications and the level of responsibility practitioners have for disseminating proper and correct information to target publics.